Is the Sigma 18–35mm ƒ/1.8 really ƒ/1.8?

Ok, this is the third time I’m writing about aperture values trying to figure out something that is puzzling, I reviewed the concept of aperture in lenses and why the Micro Fourth Thirds System has a hard time trying to emulate a full frame result in the two lasts posts:

First, let me show you a picture I have taken using the Sigma 18–35mm ƒ/1.8 with the full frame camera Canon 6D:

Canon 6D image using the Sigma 18–35mm ƒ/1.8 showing different crop factors

As you can see, the vignetting is quite evident, this is because this lens isn’t designed for full frame cameras but for crop cameras, nevertheless it can be used on a full frame camera because of the EF mount, but, if it is a truly ƒ/1.8 lense, Why it has vignetting? Well, because a truly ƒ/1.8 will completely fill a full frame sensor, Sigma decided to make a version for crop cameras using the very same glass measurements but cropping the extra glass that filled a full frame area, thus, making the same result of a truly ƒ/1.8 lens could have but with the extra unused light, in other words, reducing the aperture.

So, if you could make a truly full frame 18–35mm ƒ/1.8 you will see the very same result as the Sigma lens on crop cameras, but you cannot use the Sigma lens on a full frame camera because, after doing some measurements on the vignetting (not scientific calculations) I have find that the real aperture of this lens is ƒ/2.8 on paper.

I’m going to illustrate this idea of “croping” the glass in order to achieve the same results in crop lenses, let’s say you have a full frame lens and camera, a 50mm ƒ/1.8 on a full frame Canon 6D camera, let’s see how the light is used on different sensor sizes:

So, you want to emulate the same result on a crop camera, the Canon 80D for instance, dividing the focal length and the aperture using 1.6x crop factor give us a 31.2mm ƒ/1.12 lens, but that doesn’t exist, so the closer lens is a 30mm ƒ/1.2:

And, as you can see, a full frame lens will project light for a full frame sensor, but this light isn’t being used, so, they crop the glass that isn’t used in a crop camera:

This solution make the lens look like a 30mm ƒ/1.2 but in reality it is a ƒ/1.9 lens, close to a ƒ/1.8 lens, this is what Sigma did and what most manufacturers do with their crop camera lenses, so in reality they are not selling a truly ƒ/1.8 lens but a lens that on a crop camera looks like and works like a ƒ/1.8 lens, what intrigues me is how most manufacturers for the Micro Fourth Thirds System are making their lenses, Are they truly making big aperture lenses or just cropping lenses?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Releated

GoPro is NOT made for the beach, and GoPro doesn’t tell you that!

It is kind of ironic that on April 1st my GoPro HERO9 Black died. I was recording my children in the shallow waters of a Salvadoran beach in Los Cobanos when suddenly an SD card error appeared on the screen, and I wasn’t able to shut down the camera. I have long known the camera’s […]

Gaussian Splatting in macOS 100% free

After watching Olli Huttunen’s gaussian splatting experiments with both, the Insta360 and the Antigravity A1 I wondered if there was an option to do the same, but with an Apple Silicon Macintosh and using free/libre software, and the answer is a resounding yes, it can be done. Update: Thanks to a comment from @ichsan2895 I […]